Mc Naught & Co
News

Freedom of Speech : Case Review

CASE REVIEW:                     JANKIELSOHN V BOOYSEN (2019) JOL 46248 (FB)

JUDGMENT:                           DAFFUE ,J

 

Media recently covered DA’s, Dr. Roy Jankielsohn victory against members of the ANC YOUTH league over racial slurs, the 29-page judgment was handed down on the 11th November 2019, and Jankielsohn was awarded R300 000.00 in damages.

 

The case in essence was about the balancing of two constitutional rights, the right to dignity and freedom of expression.

 

Although freedom of expression is a fundamental to our democratic society, it is not a paramount value, it must be construed in the context of other values enshrined in our Constitution. In particular the values of human dignity, freedom and equality.

 

To dissect further, Section 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides for the right to human dignity: “Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected”. Recognising a right to dignity is an acknowledgement of the intrinsic worth of human beings.

 

Freedom of expression is guaranteed by the South African Bill of Rights under section 16, within the Constitution. This is the absolute letter of the law: Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, which includes: Freedom to receive or impart information or ideas. However it does not extend to freedom of expression to hate speech.

 

Racism is an extremely sensitive issue, especially in South Africa therefore attempting to accuse one of being a racist can also be an infringement of rights. Reckless statements and with indifference as to whether it was true or false can be actuated to malice. Reliance on section 16 of the Constitution can be ill-founded where it is evident that statements involve advocacy of hatred based on race and constitutes incitement to cause harm.

 

The victory of this case in effect establishes that we cannot just throw around the R-Word.

Share this article
Now!
Read our
most recent!
Wrongfulness and Legal Duty

Wrongfulness and Legal Duty

A recent judgment was passed in the Supreme Court of Appeal, the facts to the case itself are indeed interesting, especially for pet owners. The claimant in the matter, arranged with her friends for a weekend of leisure at the Harmony Park Resort, a day camp (the Day Camp) situated at Strand in the Western Cape. The Day Camp was a public facility under the control of the defendant, the City of Cape Town.

Read More
SA Divorces up by 20% since Lockdown Level 4

SA Divorces up by 20% since Lockdown Level 4

Courts around South Africa are battling a surprising divorce backlog. This is such a problem that a plan to fast-track annulments of more than 11 000 failed marriages in Limpopo alone has had to be devised. Limpopo is not the only province with a heavy load of divorce applications. The South Gauteng High Court heard 33 unopposed divorces last Friday.

Read More
Are Mothers’ rights more equal than Fathers’?

Are Mothers’ rights more equal than Fathers’?

Parental Responsibilities and Rights are under the spotlight today. The Children’s Act 38 of 2005 has attempted to focus our society and courts’ attention on the interests of the child which are paramount in any custody or contact dispute between parents.

Read More