Mc Naught & Co
High Court ruling helps property buyers
The North Gauteng High Court on Monday made an unprecedented declaration in a case before it that the Municipality practice of holding a property purchaser liable for past debts of the previous owner is unconstitutional. It clarified a long drawn-out battle between residential property buyers and municipalities.
Municipal Systems Act unconstitutional
The judgment dealt with Sec 118 (3) of the Municipal Systems Act which allowed past debt to attach to the property, and which the court ruled is constitutionally invalid. This judgment will now have to go the Constitutional Court for confirmation, but in the meantime is binding against the Gauteng Municipalities involved and will likely be applied to every Municipality in the country who have been applying the Act in contravention of the Constitution. This is of great relief to property purchasers, some of whom have been saddled with huge past debts they did not incur and in some cases were denied connection of new services until the past debts of the previous owner/s were settled.
Share this article
SA Divorces up by 20% since Lockdown Level 4
Courts around South Africa are battling a surprising divorce backlog. This is such a problem that a plan to fast-track annulments of more than 11 000 failed marriages in Limpopo alone has had to be devised. Limpopo is not the only province with a heavy load of divorce applications. The South Gauteng High Court heard 33 unopposed divorces last Friday.
Are Mothers’ rights more equal than Fathers’?
Parental Responsibilities and Rights are under the spotlight today. The Children’s Act 38 of 2005 has attempted to focus our society and courts’ attention on the interests of the child which are paramount in any custody or contact dispute between parents.
Has COVID-19 Become a Convenient Excuse for Dismissals?
After being on a lock down for a substantial period, the South African economy is finally getting into the swing of things, however businesses have had to do some serious internal restructuring, which for some, unfortunately, include the retrenchment of its employees. Have employers followed the correct procedure as set out in the Labour Relations Act or are employers using the pandemic as an unfair advantage and hiding behind the pretext of “flattening the curve” ?