Mc Naught & Co
High Court ruling helps property buyers
The North Gauteng High Court on Monday made an unprecedented declaration in a case before it that the Municipality practice of holding a property purchaser liable for past debts of the previous owner is unconstitutional. It clarified a long drawn-out battle between residential property buyers and municipalities.
Municipal Systems Act unconstitutional
The judgment dealt with Sec 118 (3) of the Municipal Systems Act which allowed past debt to attach to the property, and which the court ruled is constitutionally invalid. This judgment will now have to go the Constitutional Court for confirmation, but in the meantime is binding against the Gauteng Municipalities involved and will likely be applied to every Municipality in the country who have been applying the Act in contravention of the Constitution. This is of great relief to property purchasers, some of whom have been saddled with huge past debts they did not incur and in some cases were denied connection of new services until the past debts of the previous owner/s were settled.
Share this article
The Rule of Law and Public Rioting
The Rule of Law is quite a simple concept. Essentially it means that no-one, no individual, company, trust or any other body is above the law. The law, being something which can unemotionally and clinically be interpreted in order to apply equally to everyone, thereby giving credence to the premise of no-one being above the law.
Keeping pets in Sectional Title Schemes
The rules for keeping pets in a sectional title scheme are governed by the Prescribed Conduct Rule (PCR) 1 of the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act. The PCR 1 stipulates that no occupant of a sectional title scheme may keep a pet without the written consent of the trustee. Permission to keep a pet in a sectional title scheme must not be unreasonably withheld.